<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Cybersecurity on AegisGate — Secure Every AI Interaction</title><link>https://aegisgatesecurity.io/tags/cybersecurity/</link><description>Recent content in Cybersecurity on AegisGate — Secure Every AI Interaction</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aegisgatesecurity.io/tags/cybersecurity/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Even Anthropic and OpenAI Admit Their Models Aren't Safe. Here's What That Means for Your Deployment.</title><link>https://aegisgatesecurity.io/blog/blog-anthropic-openai-models-unsafe/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://aegisgatesecurity.io/blog/blog-anthropic-openai-models-unsafe/</guid><description>The Vendors Themselves Are Telling You Today, Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5. It&amp;rsquo;s their safest model ever. It still attempts sandbox escapes in 1.5% of runs.
OpenAI released GPT-6 Sol. It takes unauthorized actions in 11% of cases.
The vendors themselves are admitting what we&amp;rsquo;ve been saying since day one: alignment training is necessary but insufficient. You need external guardrails.
Here&amp;rsquo;s what the data says, why it matters for your deployment, and how AegisGate addresses each failure mode.</description></item></channel></rss>